3. New Testament Language

   
   Red Jesus Text: On | Off    Paragraph Numbers: On | Off
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

3. NEW TESTAMENT LANGUAGE

I. NEW TESTAMENT GREEK

1. In the times of Christ, three languages were spoken in Palestine—Aramaic, Greek, and Latin. The official language was Latin.

2. General interests were:

a. Hebrew—The right. Prophets and psalmists.
b. Greek—Ideal. Artists and philosophers.
c. Roman—Practical. Statesmen, legislators.

3. In early times, there were many dialects of classic Greek.

4. KOINE Greek was the common language developed by Alexander’s army. By the first century of our era it had become the language of the Roman Empire.

5. Paul’s letter to the Romans was written in Koine Greek. Koine was a simplification of classic Greek.

6. Koine Greek was the language of Philo and Josephus.

7. Modern Greek is Byzantine Greek. Came in from seventh to eleventh century.

II. THE NEW TESTAMENT AUTHORS

1. HEBREWS. Of all books in the New Testament Hebrews attains the highest standard of literary quality of Koine Greek. The style is systematic and very different from Paul. The Urantia Book suggests that Hebrews had several authors. See (1024.2) 93:9.11. Paul was probably one of them. See (539.5) 47:10.3, next to last paragraph. The quotation credited to Paul is Hebrews 12:22. This is the only New Testament book which refers to Melchizedek.

2. JAMES. Along with Hebrews, James is at the top of literary excellence. It is distinctly Jewish, but in excellent language. There are no Hebraisms. The book exhibits great literary skill in alliteration and syllable formation.

3. LUKE AND ACTS. Luke, the physician (Col 4:14), was the most versatile of all New Testament writers. The preface to the gospel of Luke ( 1:1-4) is the most perfect of Greek composition, comparing with the preface of Herodotus. Luke uses 750 words not found elsewhere in the New Testament. Many times his words indicate the medical viewpoint—Peter’s mother-in-law had a high fever. A man was full of leprosy. Professional pride caused him to leave out—”and she was no better,” in the case of the woman who had “suffered many things from many physicians.” Luke avoids foreign words.

He never uses “rabbi,” always “master.” But as a true reporter he often retains Jewish idiom—like “and it came to pass.” In Acts he employs the more elegant Greek.

4. I PETER. I Peter shows more classical Greek than any other New Testament writing. There is little or no vernacular Koine. There is here such an “elegant touch” as to suggest that such refined nicety is beyond the literary ability of the Galilean fisherman whose Aramaic brogue betrayed him. The dignity and elevation of this epistle suggests that it might have been dictated to, and revised by, Peter’s secretary, Silvanus. I Peter 5:12.

5. MARK. Mark is an example of the nonliterary Koine. There is a lack of polish in Mark’s colloquial style which is somewhat covered up when put in English. He is very repetitious. Of 45 verses in the first chapter, 35 begin with “and.” Twelve of 16 chapters begin in the same way. Mark had a small vocabulary. Of 1290 words he uses, only 80 are peculiar to him, as compared with the other gospels. But there is a freshness and vigor along with great brevity that marks him as an “artistic genius.”

6. REVELATION. Of all New Testament books, Revelation is on the lowest literary level of Koine Greek. Dionysius of Alexandria called the Greek of Revelation barbaric. The writer seems to think in Aramaic while writing in Greek. Nevertheless, the book is filled with powerful sayings. One explanation of these peculiarities of Revelation may be its frequent revisions and distortions. See Urantia Book, (1555.7) 139:4.14

7. MATTHEW. Matthew’s Greek is better than Mark’s, but not so good as Luke’s. It is smoother than Mark’s, but more monotonous than Luke’s. Matthew has 95 personal expressions, as compared with Mark’s 41 and Luke’s 151. Matthew has a penchant for grouping things by threes or sevens:

Three divisions of genealogy.
Three temptations.
Three illustrations of righteousness.
Three commands.
Three miracles of healing.
Threefold “Fear not.”
Three parables of sowing.
Three parables of warning.
Three prayers in the Garden.
Three denials by Peter.
Three questions by Pilate.
Seven clauses in the Lord’s prayer.
Seven demons.
Seven parables.
Seven loves.
Seven baskets.
Forgiving not seven times.
Seven brothers.
Seven woes.

8. JOHN. John’s gospel has a simplicity and grandeur which is unrivaled by any other book of the New Testament. John’s vocabulary is less than that of the other gospels, but far more impressive and majestic. He makes effective use of fundamental words, such as: truth, light, world, sin, judgment, and life. His construction is sometimes almost “child-like.” A stylistic peculiarity of John is combining negative and positive expressions: “He confessed and denied not.” “Should not perish, but have everlasting life.” He writes pure Greek, but the Semitic viewpoint is always appearing. There are two other peculiarities. He writes in short weighty sentences. “I am the light of the world.” “Jesus wept,” the shortest verse in the Bible. The other, a peculiar circular or spiral-motion type of reasoning. See John 8:38-44.

9. EPISTLES OF PAUL. Paul had a characteristic style, though his letters vary greatly. Now and then he almost reaches the high level of Plato. He likes to ask and answer supposed questions or objections. Most of his epistles were dictated. The Timothy and Titus letters are a bit different from the other epistles. If Paul had known his letters were to become part of “the word of God”—inspired Scripture—he would have edited them more carefully, as someone later on did edit and polish up Ephesians.

10. II PETER. The style of II Peter is very different from that of I Peter. The Greek is awkward, but is greatly improved by translation into English. Important words are frequently repeated. If these differences are due to different secretaries, then Peter gave his secretaries much freedom of expression. Most scholars think II Peter was written early in the second century.

11. JUDE. The style of Jude is better than II Peter, but is very much like that of the second chapter of II Peter. Jude likes to express himself in triads. It is good idiomatic Koine Greek.

12. LANGUAGE OF JESUS. Jesus taught in good everyday Aramaic. Many Aramaic words and phrases are carried over into New Testament records. The Jews were fond of puns and many of Jesus’ sayings were on this order. The saying about “straining out gnats and swallowing the camel” was a pun—the Aramaic words for gnat and camel made a jingle.

III. INTERPRETATION OF NEW TESTAMENT LANGUAGE

1. Three influences determine the interpretation of New Testament Greek:

a. Influence of Old Testament usage.
b. Everyday Koine usage.
c. Special meaning given to words by early Christian usage.

2. Discovery of Egyptian papyri in the nineteenth century taught translators how to understand Koine Greek.

3. Illustration: Jesus’ statement about being unable by anxious thought to add one cubit to his stature. What Jesus really said: “Add to your span of life.”

4. The Old Testament is the lexicon of the New Testament. Many New Testament words can be understood only by Old Testament usage. Law in Greek means statute—in Old Testament usage it means revelation—God’s will.

5. In Hebrew the word “parable” covers “sayings” as well as “stories.”

6. Christianity created new words and phrases, such as “in Christ.”

7. The word “grace” takes on new meaning in New Testament theology.

8. The word “peace” comes to mean vastly more in Christian religion than formerly.

9. “The world and the flesh” comes to have new meanings in Christianity. Other words having new meanings were: life, faith, save, meek, election, and kingdom of God.

Foundation Info

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

Urantia Foundation, 533 W. Diversey Parkway, Chicago, IL 60614, USA
Tel: +1-773-525-3319; Fax: +1-773-525-7739
© Urantia Foundation. All rights reserved